Weblog

Wednesday, 24 September 2008

  • Civil Duty

    As I began to gather my notes today for what was to be my second writing in regards to the depreciating dollar, its possible replacement and the repercussions it would have towards the nation and undoubtedly the world; I was stopped short by a sudden thought that drew upon me; this thought of that, “If I had an opportunity to speak and influence the citizens of the world, what would I say to them? If I had a chance to contribute my idealism to the nations near and far, what would they be?”

    At first, I thought that my answers to these questions would be influenced with the discussion of economical and political oversight and possible solutions, if any. But as I furthered my debate, I slowly came to realize that I alone do not have those answers. I am not an economist, who computes and factors the economic efficiency of a nation. Nor am I a politician, who creates and votes legislative laws. I am however, a citizen of a nation, and in a grander scheme, a fellow citizen ofthe world. And with this in mind, my answer grew clear. We, not as Americans, not as Blacks, Mexicans, Whites, Arabs, Jews or Asians; but as citizens, have one civil duty to uphold. Not written in any laws of man, but etched in the very essence of our being, is the civil duty to help each other.

    It was this very same duty that one man led his people hand in hand and showed them that hate can be overshadowed by love. That violence only begets more violence and hope can be as powerful of a weapon as guns and fists. It is this very same duty that a presidential hopeful, was able to calm, comfort and reason, with those who felt oppressed and forgotten. He once said, “Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written the history of this generation.”

    In these days and times, it is easy to forget that it was not too long ago, that man had a different definition of equality. It is also easy to forget, that the world is not too different now from what it was before. It was then, as it is now, a time of shame and fault; for we as human beings, are creatures of logic and imperfections. But these imperfections are the very same foundations from which we learn and grow from. That is what separates man from all other creatures. It is this very reason that now more than ever, we should take responsibility not just for our mistakes, but for the civil duty we owe one another.

    As wars wage away from home and at our doorsteps; as the world’s economy show signs of faltering, it is imperative that we do not give in to hate, hopelessness and despair. Instead, we must clarify the lines between governed and enslavement, patriotism and warmongering, security and apprehension. This generation of leaders must be reminded that politics is a form of debate and not a forum for controversy and mockery. And its people, be reminded or informed, of any and all of their government’s affairs.

    And so, this civil duty should then be in our utmost interest, for it is the actions that we portray today that will be the inspiration for those who will lead tomorrow. As Robert Kennedy once said, “Our answer is the world’s hope; it is to rely on youth.”

Tuesday, 23 September 2008

  • As the World Turns.. and turns... and turns...

    Today, Republican Ron Paul wrote on CNN.com that the Government bailout proposed by President Bush will lead this country to a "Rough Economic Ride".

    Here's what he wrote:

    "Many Americans today are asking themselves how the economy got to be in such a bad spot.

    For years they thought the economy was booming, growth was up, job numbers and productivity were increasing. Yet now we find ourselves in what is shaping up to be one of the most severe economic downturns since the Great Depression.

    Unfortunately, the government's preferred solution to the crisis is the very thing that got us into this mess in the first place: government intervention.

    Ever since the 1930s, the federal government has involved itself deeply in housing policy and developed numerous programs to encourage homebuilding and homeownership.

    Government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae  and Freddie Mac were able to obtain a monopoly position in the mortgage market, especially the mortgage-backed securities market, because of the advantages bestowed upon them by the federal government.

    Laws passed by Congress such as the Community Reinvestment Act required banks to make loans to previously underserved segments of their communities, thus forcing banks to lend to people who normally would be rejected as bad credit risks.

    These governmental measures, combined with the Federal Reserve's loose monetary policy, led to an unsustainable housing boom. The key measure by which the Fed caused this boom was through the manipulation of interest rates, and the open market operations that accompany this lowering.

    When interest rates are lowered to below what the market rate would normally be, as the Federal Reserve has done numerous times throughout this decade, it becomes much cheaper to borrow money. Longer-term and more capital-intensive projects, projects that would be unprofitable at a high interest rate, suddenly become profitable.

    Because the boom comes about from an increase in the supply of money and not from demand from consumers, the result is malinvestment, a misallocation of resources into sectors in which there is insufficient demand.

    In this case, this manifested itself in overbuilding in real estate . When builders realize they have overbuilt and have too many houses to sell, too many apartments to rent, or too much commercial real estate to lease, they seek to recoup as much of their money as possible, even if it means lowering prices drastically.

    This lowering of prices brings the economy back into balance, equalizing supply and demand. This economic adjustment means, however that there are some winners -- in this case, those who can again find affordable housing without the need for creative mortgage products, and some losers -- builders and other sectors connected to real estate that suffer setbacks.

    The government doesn't like this, however, and undertakes measures to keep prices artificially inflated. This was why the Great Depression was as long and drawn out in this country as it was.

    I am afraid that policymakers today have not learned the lesson that prices must adjust to economic reality. The bailout of Fannie and Freddie, the purchase of AIG, and the latest multi-hundred billion dollar Treasury scheme all have one thing in common: They seek to prevent the liquidation of bad debt and worthless assets at market prices, and instead try to prop up those markets and keep those assets trading at prices far in excess of what any buyer would be willing to pay.

    Additionally, the government's actions encourage moral hazard of the worst sort. Now that the precedent has been set, the likelihood of financial institutions to engage in riskier investment schemes is increased, because they now know that an investment position so overextended as to threaten the stability of the financial system will result in a government bailout and purchase of worthless, illiquid assets.

    Using trillions of dollars of taxpayer money to purchase illusory short-term security, the government is actually ensuring even greater instability in the financial system in the long term.

    The solution to the problem is to end government meddling in the market. Government intervention leads to distortions in the market, and government reacts to each distortion by enacting new laws and regulations, which create their own distortions, and so on ad infinitum.

    It is time this process is put to an end. But the government cannot just sit back idly and let the bust occur. It must actively roll back stifling laws and regulations that allowed the boom to form in the first place.

    The government must divorce itself of the albatross of Fannie and Freddie, balance and drastically decrease the size of the federal budget, and reduce onerous regulations on banks and credit unions that lead to structural rigidity in the financial sector.

    Until the big-government apologists realize the error of their ways, and until vocal free-market advocates act in a manner which buttresses their rhetoric, I am afraid we are headed for a rough ride."

    By Ron Paul
    Special to CNN

     

    If you're still up to it, then read on...

    What does this mean to you? First, let's look at where we're getting this money from. The government doesn't have money. Regardless of what you think, they don't. The money they use to fund such causes like wars, government sponsored programs or this economic bailout comes from borrowed money from the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is the Central Bank of the United States which is a "government entity with private components" and is made up of The Board of Governors, Federal Open Market Committee and numerous private banks who elect their own members of the board of directors at their regional Federal Reserve Bank. The Board of Governors however are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate.

    Now, even though the Board of Governors are appointed by the President as representatives and is the governing body of the Federal Reserve, it is important to know that the Federal Reserve is an Independent Government Institution able to act on its own without consent from the Senate or the President.

    The Federal Reserve issues our currency and controls the amount of money that circulates in the United States. It is also important to know that when they issue out currency, it is a loan. So whenever the government asks the Federal Reserve to give them money, they are actually asking the Federal Reserve to loan them money. This money that the government borrows is then paid back not by the government's pocket, but ours. Yes, you and me; the tax payers.

    It is also noteworthy to understand that any loans from any banking institution, comes with interest. This amount is decided by the institution that carries out the loans and is added on to the amount borrowed. This alone, creates debt. Currently the United States has accumulated a National Debt of $9,664,631,803,259.07.

    Let's go back to the subject; if we were to bail out Wall-Street and continue to borrow money from the Federal Reserve, the most likely result would be that the value of the already depreciating dollar would continue to spiral down and in-turn create an infinite debt. IF this is the case, then the dollar would eventually be destroyed. What happens then?

    Enter the Amero. You may not know this, but there are talks of erasing the border lines between the US, Canada and Mexico, which will result in the North American Union or NAU (similar to what is now known as the European Union). This is still supposedly just a theoretical development, but many political skeptics believe that this is already in the works.

    One main reason for this accusation is the creation of SPP or Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America which went active as of March 2005. The SPP presents itself as a, "trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing."

    Another key debate is the proposed currency for this theoretical union; the Amero, which according to some, have already been developed. In an interview with CNBC on Nov. 27, 2006, a Vice-President of a prominent London investment firm urged a move away from the dollar to the Amero and was quoted to have said that the Amero, "will have a big impact on everybody's life, in Canda, the U.S. and Mexico."

    Steve Previs, a Vice-President at Jefferies International Ltd., explained that the Amero "is the proposed new currency for the North American Community which is being developed right now between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico."  

    This sadly went under the radar of most Americans. With the continuing decline of our economy and the compulsive borrowing of the government; which may lead to the fall of the American dollar, things seem to be set in place for such a "theoretical union".

    Part II coming soon...

Friday, 19 September 2008

  • Economy Found Another Way To Die

    Eight years ago, budget experts projected a $170 Billion surplus for the 2009 fiscal year. Now, the federal budget is projected to run a $546 Billion deficit. That's a $1.3 Trillion deterioration in our nations fiscal finances. Now, the Congressional Budget Office or CBO also released a ten-year projection in 2001, in which the CBO speculated a cumulative surplus of $5.6 Trillion for 2002-2011, but now are reporting that the nation will suffer a deficit of $3.8 Trillion which is a $9.4 Trillion deterioration.

     

    Though we can partially blame the weak performance of the economy along with some un-expected factors beyond our control, these issues only make up less than one-fourth of the reason. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Prioritieswebsite, “Even given the disappointing performance of the economy since 2001 relative to CBO’s earlier projections, there would have been large surpluses in every year – totaling $3.4 trillion over the 2002-2011 period – if policy makers had enacted no tax cuts or program increases since 2001.”

     

    So what’s the reason for the huge turn over? CBPP claims that, “The key factors have been large tax cuts and increases in security-related programs.”

     

    How Legislation Enacted since 2001 contributed to deficit for 2009:

     

    ·         Tax cuts.  Enactment of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, along with AMT relief, the normal “tax extenders,” and a variety of minor tax provisions have worsened the 2009 budget by $427 billion and thus account for 42 percent of the $1 trillion deterioration.  These figures include both the direct costs of the tax cuts and their associated interest costs.  (By reducing projected revenues, the tax cuts have increased deficits and debt relative to the January 2001 projection.  With higher debt, the Treasury must pay more interest.)

    • Increases in appropriations for defense, international affairs, and homeland security.  Expenditures projected for this portion of the budget in 2009 are much higher than CBO projected in early 2001.  While a substantial portion of the extra costs stem from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, there have also been significant increases in the underlying budgets of the Departments of Defense, State, and Homeland Security that are not directly related to these wars.  Total increases in this part of the budget amount to $399 billion in 2009, relative to CBO’s projection, and thus account for 40 percent of the $1 trillion deterioration, when the associated interest costs are included.

    ·         Increases in entitlement programs.  Since 2001, Congress has enacted a number of entitlement increases, most notably the Medicare prescription drug benefit, but also increases in farm and nutrition programs, military retirement and health care, veterans’ education benefits, and other, smaller programs.  These cost increases amount to $119 billion in 2009, or 12 percent of the $1 trillion deterioration.

    • Increases in appropriations for domestic, or non-security, programs.  Funding for this portion of the budget has also increased above the levels projected in 2001, although this funding peaked in real terms in 2004 and has generally declined since then.  The largest increases have occurred in education programs, veterans’ health care, and transportation programs.  The increased expenditures in this part of the budget total $66 billion in 2009, or 6 percent of the $1 trillion deterioration.

    In short, tax cuts, increased defense and security funding are the key factors that the large surpluses projected form 2001 ended up becoming deficits. I’m not an economist so look it up your-self. You can start here.

     

    As I end this blog, I leave you with these few audio and visual thoughts...

     

     

     

Wednesday, 17 September 2008

  • Mad Men





    While you sit there shaking your head; either pretending not to see it or are in disbelief that it could really happen, you can't deny the fact that we are in a state of crisis. Yet, you sit there and take it. Doing what they want you to do. You buy the clothes and shoes that they've over priced and marketed as a way to be accepted in society. You've fatten yourself with the food and beer they've saturated with disease and drugs, masking it behind a fancy decor and pricey menus. You've let them stupefy you with their media, gadgets and gears to such an extreme that you willfully put yourself in future or further debt with out any thought of the repercussions. You've let them wage countless wars and supported their fictional battle against people who we will never find. You've let them lead you blindly to worship a force that you've never seen, met or have spoken to. You've let them create a monetary system built to enslave you instead of rewarding you. You've let them drown you in a delusionary system whose only purpose to keep you occupied and drain you of any will to critically think. You are their slave. They've silenced our leaders who questioned their authority, and replaced them with their own faculty of Bankers, Oil Tycoons and Privateers.

    You don't have to take this as the truth, and it's better that you don't. Don't listen to one person's opinion. Find your own goddamn truth! For crying out-loud! Think! Search!! QUESTION!!!!

    "This world; this society, will never move forward to the future that was intended for us, nor will we ever find the truth, if we never open ourselves to all the possibilities." -Romel Salazar (Kon)

Friday, 12 September 2008

  • Dear Xanga

    I came back to xanga just to tell xanga that I'm leaving you. Let's face it, we haven't talked for such a long time and you don't know me like I don't know you anymore. This is a dead relationship. I know you've tried to connect with me again, sending me e-mails about how much you've missed me and how you want me to come back, but the truth is, I don't want to come back. It's not you, it's me. Really. I know you've heard that a thousand times before and you probably think that I'm just being nice. Well, yes I am; but I'm also telling you the truth. For the time that I've been gone, I've gone through some changes. Changes that affected my thoughts and perception of everything. And within these changes, I realized that I can never go back to what I use to have. I can never go back to you. There's no need for bitter tears or pleas for me to reconsider because there is nothing for me to reconsider.

    Let's not make this difficult and just move on our separate ways and lets accept the fact that we've both changed. You've upgraded and added more links and features, changing your interface to some extent and I've outgrown blogging or even communicating with other living organisms for that matter. These changes have led us here, to this inevitable cross-road that will ultimately fling us to two un-parallel paths. It may be hard to accept, but we both saw this coming. And, so with deep regrets Xanga, I must say goodbye to you. No, no, no... don't cry... shhh... it'll be alright. You have so many other subscribers that a loss of one already in-active blogger would seem rather insignificant. And rather than looking at this situation as sad parting, I think we should both look at the fond memories we've shared together; the long sleepless nights I would twitter about whatever my mind could fabricate. Silly little moods that I would select to display my current state of mind. Ahh... such golden times. I'll miss you.

    Well, I guess this is goodbye, so... Goodbye.

     

    -Kon

     

Kons_3pts

  • Visit Kons_3pts's Xanga Site
    • Birthday: 5/14/1980
    • Member Since: 9/2/2005

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

  • "Yeah, you could say it's something like that..."

Pulse

Kons_3pts has no pulse!...

Photostrip

[no photos]

Recommended

[no recommendations]